I have been catching up on all of the readings and articles
that are posted in our assignments. I will
confess that when I first heard the term Web 2.0 five years ago, it just seemed
to me to be hype. It did not help that Web
2.0 was one of the buzzword (along with other corporate speak) that was circulating
at the time. Regardless, whether it was
hype of real it was not relevant to what I was doing at the time. Well I was
wrong.
The fact is we are witnessing seminal changes in how culture
and society interact. The concepts of
libraries transforming and becoming the conduits for creativity, providing the
venue through which new content is created, disseminated, and shared, is
profound. Of course, there is always
resistance to change. Unfortunately, in
particular with the public library, the need to adapt to the new paradigm is
paramount. Academic and specialty
libraries will have to change, yet the means of adaptation may prove easier
especially to those libraries that primarily cater to the scientific or
technical researcher. Such a patron will
demand rapid adaptation to the 2.0 concepts.
The more traditional college or university library may have
a difficult time determining just where to put the dollars in order to move
forward. As I have seen and learned in my quest for the MLIS the 2.0 librarian
will have to be an adaptive creature. My
original ideas about librarianship in general have been turned on their
proverbial head more than once as I expand my scope.
Kim
Web 2.0 is a buzzword that I was unfamiliar with until taking this class. I think this is because I never thought to categorize online technologies and always considered it an evolving organism. I also am looking forward to expanding my scope of open-source social media softwares that are freely available.
ReplyDelete